top of page
Injury/Accident
Search

Police Officer's Trip and Fall is barred by Firefighter's Rule

  • Writer: Cory Morris
    Cory Morris
  • Dec 9, 2015
  • 2 min read

This case discusses the New York firefighter rule. Based on that rule, the Queens Supreme Court granted the Defendant's summary judgment in this case. The Plaintiff was a New York City Police Officer who allegedly tripped and injured herself. She sued under General Municipal Law § 205-e (not discussed here) and for negligence. "[T]he defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that the action was barred by the firefighter rule, that they did not have actual or constructive notice of any dangerous condition, and that the provisions alleged by the injured plaintiff to be predicates for liability under General Municipal Law §205-e were not proper to sustain that claim." Pp. 2

Rule: "The firefighter rule provides that police and firefighters may not recover in common-law negligence for line-of-duty injuries resulting from risks associated with the particular dangers inherent in that type of employment." Pp. 2 (citing Wadler v. City of New York, 14 NY3d 192, 194; Gammons v. City of New York, 109 AD3d 189, 193, affd 24 NY3d 562). "[T]he rule bars an officer's… recovery 'when the performance of his or her duties increased the risk of the injury happening, and did not merely furnish the occasion for the injury'" (Wadler v. City of New York, 14 NY3d at 194-195, quoting Zanghi v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Commn., 85 NY2d 423, 436).

The Plaintiff failed to established that her lawsuit was not barred by the firefighter's rule - "The injured plaintiff's injury did not occur during an act in furtherance of a police function which exposed her to a heightened risk of sustaining that injury. The performance of her duties merely furnished the occasion for the injury." Pp. 2.

Kelly v. NYC, 9335/10, NYLJ 1202743888076, at *1 (App. Div., 2nd, Decided December 2, 2015) (available at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202743888076/Kelly-v-City-of-New-York-933510#ixzz3tTCXC2sj).

 
 
 

Comments


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

FOLLOW US:

  • Instagram Social Icon
  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Google+ Black Square
  • Twitter Clean
  • LinkedIn Basic Black


Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

This web site is designed to provide general information only and to help in the choice of appropriate legal counsel. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal advice. Legal jurisdictions differ on major and minor aspects of the law and each legal situation is unique; requiring that all legal situations be addressed with qualified legal counsel. Statutes and case law frequently change; the accuracy of this information can only be represented as of the date of publication.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Submitting or receiving information web does not create an attorney client relationship. No attorney client relationship will exist unless you meet with one of our attorneys and sign a retainer agreement. Please do not submit any information that is case specific, personal or confidential. 

RSS Feed
  • LinkedIn App Icon
  • Blogger App Icon
  • Wix Twitter page
  • RSS Social Icon
NADC_logo_200.png
NYSDAL.jpg
bottom of page